Latest security news
- Spotless compliance evidence can still hide a broken control
- From critical to controlled: Cutting vulnerabilities in a live manufacturing environment
- Attackers already know the secrets are on your developers’ machines. Do you?
- Product showcase: Trend Micro Mobile Security detects scams in messages, QR codes, and websites
- ETSI sets security requirements for AI data centers and cloud platforms
- Microsoft responds to security challenges facing code, AI agents, and models
- Infosecurity Europe: Vulnerability Management Innovator Konvu Wins Cyber Startup Award
- Simplify security management with CIS SecureSuite Platform
- Autonomous AI-driven worm can reason its way through corporate networks
- Malware campaign targeting Minecraft users infects over 116,000 systems
- Only 11% of production agents pass the AI agent security bar
- Trump Signs Order Inviting Voluntary Review of Frontier AI Models
- Infosecurity Europe: How to Get Boards to Prioritize Cyber Risk Quantification
- Anthropic Expands Mythos Access to 150 More Organizations
- Infosecurity Europe: Patch Responsibility Remains Up for Grabs as AI Unearths Decades of Flaws
- Infosecurity Europe: Execs Must Treat Cyber Threats as Statecraft, ISACA Expert Say
- Infosecurity Europe: AI-Powered Cybercrime Tools Surge on Dark Web
- Infosecurity Europe: NCSC Urges Immediate Action to Boost Resilience as Uncertainty Persists
- Infosecurity Europe: Cybersecurity Teams Which Don’t Leverage AI are "Doomed to Fail"
- Infosecurity Europe: Bayer Reinvents Security Awareness Training to Counter AI Threats
- Threat Actor Uses AI to Build EDR Evasion Tools
- Infosecurity Europe: UK Firms Prioritize AI Threat Preparedness as Cyber Risks Evolve
- Attackers Hijack Red Hat npm Scope to Steal Cloud Secrets
- Infosecurity Europe: Business Leaders Lack Understanding of Threat Intelligence, Study Warns
- Critical Flowise Flaw Gives Attackers Full Server Control
In this interview with Help Net Security, Marc Rubbinaccio, Head of Cybersecurity and Compliance at Secureframe, explains where security teams go wrong when preparing for CMMC and FedRAMP 20x. The conversation covers how organizations check the 110 requirements but miss the 320 assessment objectives beneath them, why spotless SOC 2 evidence can hide a broken control, and how continuous monitoring is changing compliance work. It also includes advice for junior practitioners on AI and practical …
(C) Do-Know.com (http://do-know.com/). Do not copy without permission from info at do-know.com.