• LLMs can assist with vulnerability scoring, but context still matters
• From AI to cyber risk, why IT leaders are anxious heading into 2026
• The next big IT security battle is all about privileged access
• SEC Charges Crypto Firms in $14m Investment Scam
• Coordinated Scams Target MENA Region With Fake Online Job Ads
• NIST, MITRE Partner on $20m AI Centers For Manufacturing and Cybersecurity
• ServiceNow to Pay $7.8bn For OT Security Specialist Armis
• La Poste Still Offline After Major DDoS Attack
• Five identity-driven shifts reshaping enterprise security in 2026
• What if your face could say “don’t record me”? Researchers think it’s possible
• Conjur: Open-source secrets management and application identity
• Governance maturity defines enterprise AI confidence
• Elementary OS 8.1 rolls out with a stronger focus on system security
• Counterfeit defenses built on paper have blind spots
• Reworked MacSync Stealer Adopts Quieter Installation Process
• Clop Ransomware Group Linked to 3.5m University of Phoenix Breach
• Top Ransomware Trends of 2025
• Nissan: Thousands Impacted By Red Hat Breach
• Hundreds of Arrests as Operation Sentinel Recovers $3m
• 86% Surge in Fake Delivery Websites Hits Shoppers During Holiday Rush
• Monitoring Tool Nezha Abused For Stealthy Post-Exploitation Access

Every new vulnerability disclosure adds another decision point for already stretched security teams. A recent study explores whether LLMs can take on part of that burden by scoring vulnerabilities at scale. While the results show promise in specific areas, consistent weaknesses continue to hold back fully automated scoring. Growing workloads push teams hard More than 40,000 CVEs were published in 2024, and the study notes that this surge has put strain on programs that score …